Budget
Bellingham Public Schools’ budget is prepared in accordance with the laws and legal requirements of the school district board, Washington state and the federal government. The budget is a moral document that expresses how the school district will direct limited resources to achieve the goals described in The Bellingham Promise, our strategic plan.
Nearly every district in our state, including ours, is facing budget challenges for 2026-27.
Due to limited state funding that has not kept pace with inflation, districts will find themselves in a difficult position to make hard decisions to maintain a balanced budget while ensuring schools have the resources necessary to provide high-quality education for all students.
The Washington State Constitution says that “the state’s primary responsibility is to make ample provision for the education of all children.” With that in mind, we have been meeting with local lawmakers to share information about our budget and what changes could help fix our circumstances.
Our state’s funding model is flawed and does not reflect the reality of what we need. We rely heavily on our local voters to consider levy measures to provide additional revenue to support staff and programs in our district. With rising costs, it’s simply not enough.
While we are grateful that our Bellingham community historically supports our school levies, the state limits how much we can collect. And more importantly, local communities should not need to make up for the basic funding that the state should provide. Again, to emphasize the urgency of this moment, unless Washington state increases its funding, districts across the state will need to make significant changes and budget cuts.
Contact
Kathryn Weilage
Chief Financial Officer
- Budget Development Process
- Open Letters and Communication
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Additional Resources
Budget Development Process
Our budgets reflects investment of resources aligned with The Bellingham Promise. The resources and spending sustain current programs and services in addition to program enhancements and recommendations coming from our budget process and district committees.
Our central mission is to improve student learning. To that end, The Bellingham Promise, our strategic plan created collaboratively with our community and adopted by the Board of Directors, will serve as the primary guide for making budget decisions.
Open Letters and Communication
Open Letters and Communication
- Budget planning for 2026-27 school year (Jan. 27, 2026)
- Public Letter from the Bellingham School Board: A Call to Fully Fund Public Education in Washington State (January 21, 2026)
- Watch or listen: Interview about high school schedule and budget (Nov. 21, 2025)
- Budget challenges and studying the high school schedule (Nov. 12, 2025)
Budget planning for 2026-27 school year (Jan. 27, 2026)
A Message from Superintendent Greg Baker
Dear students, staff, families and community,
We are continuing to plan our budget for the 2026-27 school year, and I want to provide an update on this difficult budget cycle.
I also want to acknowledge that there is a lot going on across our city, state and country right now with unrest and uncertainty.
Our schools provide safe, loving spaces for our students – ALL students, and that will not change, regardless of any challenges.
First, gratitude
We are so grateful to our community and the support you give our district through levies and bonds. Our recent levies helped significantly but didn’t solve all our shortfalls. Levies are capped by the state, restricting how much we can collect. This is especially challenging because the state legislature continues to fail to provide ample funding for PreK-12 education.
More than two thirds of our revenue is funded by the state, but we won’t know how much we are getting until legislators finish their budget session, scheduled to end in mid-March.
While we wait to see what happens in Olympia, we are focusing on balancing our budget.
Increasing costs and inflation
There are many examples of districts facing increasing costs and state funding falling short. One example in our district is the cost and reimbursement of utilities and insurance costs.

Because the state underfunds districts across the state, including ours, and the governor’s budget proposal does not include additional funds for public education, we need to look for cost-savings.
I have accepted the recommendation of the high school schedule committee, which calls for shifting from our current eight-period schedule to a seven-period schedule. This will significantly save money while still allowing the most choice and instructional time for students. See more about the high school schedule.
I’m grateful for those who served on the high school schedule committee and those of you who offered feedback this fall, which helped influence our desire to maintain as many classes and electives for students. We will be looking at other ways to save money across our district, and we will share those plans in future updates.
Declining birth rates, enrollment
Our state superintendent recently spoke about the upcoming legislative session and birth rate trends and shared the graph below. I encourage you to watch his press conference.
As you can see, the number of births across our state is declining, which means lower enrollment in schools.

This trend is consistent with what we see in Bellingham; enrollment projections for our district show a continuing dip in the coming years, despite continued growth in the city, in part because the new construction isn’t affordable for families.
Our district needs to be judicious and flexible as we experience ups and downs in enrollment so that we can continue to offer a robust education while being efficient with facilities and staffing.
We will be engaging our community in several ways to continue this conversation; we are working with a demographer to better understand enrollment trends and potential ways to contract and expand across our 22 schools and additional programs.
This could mean adjusting construction timelines and/or repurposing some of our schools or sites. Regardless of growth or reduction, we want to ensure our schools are high-quality and modernized.
I am confident we can weather these challenges, and that students in Bellingham will continue to receive a great education, despite limited resources from the state. This is thanks to the unrelenting dedication of staff, involvement of parents/guardians and support of the community.
What can we do?
If you have made it this far, maybe you are asking what you can do to help.
One way to advocate is to share your views with your state representatives.
- This one-page document summarizes shortfalls and our messaging to the state. It also includes some creative ideas that are cost-neutral to the state but would greatly help districts by giving them more flexibility.
- We will continue to advocate to our local legislators. Our school board is involved in these efforts, as well. They recently approved a resolution urging the state legislature to honor its constitutional duty to fully fund public education and penned an open letter to legislators.
All efforts are appreciated.
We will continue to work on a balanced budget for next year and share more information soon.
Our district, our students, our staff and our community deserve better from the state.
Please share questions and thoughts here.
Greg Baker
Public Letter from the Bellingham School Board: A Call to Fully Fund Public Education in Washington State (January 21, 2026)
To Whom it May Concern,
Washington’s Constitution is crystal clear about one thing: educating our children isn’t just a budget line — it is the State’s paramount duty. Our public schools are supposed to be funded fully, amply, and equitably so that every child, in every community, has access to a high-quality education.
That’s not happening, and the consequences reach far beyond school walls.
School districts across Washington — including Bellingham — are being asked to serve more complex student needs with less and less support. Inflation has pushed the cost of heat, insurance, transportation, basic staffing, and special education far beyond what the State funds. Districts are cutting back, draining reserves, and relying on local levies to fill gaps that, by law, the State is supposed to fund. As a result, school districts like Bellingham are cutting programs, draining reserves, and forced to consider options that are likely to increase class size, reduce student choice, and add to educator and staff workloads.
This doesn’t just hurt children — though it most certainly does. This legislative failure harms our entire community, our workforce, and the long-term health of Washington’s economy.
Here is what this looks like in real terms:
- Essential operating costs have skyrocketed — insurance up more than 100%, utilities up over 40% — while state funding has barely moved.
- Special education is dramatically underfunded, forcing districts to shift millions away from general education and leaving all students and teachers with fewer supports.
- Outdated state formulas — including regionalization and experience factors — fail to reflect current housing costs and labor markets, and they fail to honor our teachers commitments and experience.
- Regionalization adjustments — meant to account for local housing and labor markets — no longer match reality, leaving Bellingham with the lowest adjustment in the county despite having the highest median housing cost.
- And when enrollment fluctuates, the State has considered pulling back already-budgeted dollars — even though schools’ fixed costs don’t shrink when student numbers dip.
When we underfund public schools, we all pay the price.
Students lose opportunities.
Families lose stability.
Employers lose a prepared workforce.
Communities lose the very institutions that hold us together.
And the state loses the long-term economic strength that only a well-educated population can provide.
We can do better. And the Constitution requires us to do better.
We, the undersigned labor, community, education, and advocacy organizations, call on the Washington State Legislature to:
- Honor the Constitution and fully fund public education
- Stop tying essential funding to enrollment fluctuations
- Fix outdated formulas — including MSOCs, regionalization, and experience factors — using current data
- Fully fund special education and other state-mandated services
- Create a stable, equitable, sustainable revenue framework for the long term that strengthens not only schools, but our entire state.
Fully funded public schools are not just an investment in children; they’re the foundation of a strong workforce, a healthy democracy, and vibrant local economies. Every child, in every community, deserves a school system that prepares them for a thriving future. Their well-being—and our state’s--depend on it.
We call on the Legislature to meet this moment and keep the promise our Constitution makes: that Washington’s children, families, and communities will never be asked to succeed without the tools they need to thrive.
Watch or listen: Interview about high school schedule and budget (Nov. 21, 2025)
A Message from Superintendent Greg Baker
Dear students, families, staff and community.
Thanks to those who shared input on possible changes to the high school schedule. Our feedback form is still open, and we’d love to hear from you.
We recently filmed a “What’s Up, Doc?” episode all about high school schedule and budget and I encourage you to watch or listen (Apple or Spotify) as we discuss common questions.
Thank you to Mira, who attends Sehome High School, for her thoughtful interview and questions around this timely topic. We discuss state funding, AP courses and class size, among other things.

Chapters are listed at the bottom of the video, and you can bounce between topics that interest you.
We appreciate your interest and feedback!
Greg Baker
Budget challenges and studying the high school schedule (Nov. 12, 2025)
A Message from Superintendent Greg Baker
Dear staff, students, families and community,
Bellingham Public Schools, like other districts across the state and country, continues to face budget challenges, and we continue to seek ways to proactively balance our budget.
- Local levies: we are so grateful our voters have checked that box for us! Thank you, local voters for supporting our district via the supplemental operations levy and the facilities maintenance levy. The levies approved last week help our budget, but unfortunately, as we have shared previously, they do not fully solve all of our budget issues.
- State funding: we will continue to advocate the legislature for additional state funding and revisions to the state’s public education models that are inadequate, outdated and broken.
- Reduce expenditures: we will continue to evaluate costs, including schedules, staffing and programs. One example that has continued to come up is our high school schedule, which we enhanced with more electives in 2018 when state funding more adequately covered needs and created opportunities.
I have received some questions about the high school schedule, and I want to clarify some things.
- We do not have plans to reduce or eliminate AP or other college prep courses, regardless of schedule.
- We have not made any decisions to change our high school schedule.
- We are doing an initial exploration of different high school schedules through a committee made up of staff to help evaluate positives, challenges and questions, should we decide to change ours in the future.
- The committee is still meeting, and I plan to share their thinking with our community and ask for input from students, families and staff.
In the meantime, we welcome your advocacy as well as your understanding of the difficult choices districts face due to inadequate state funding. Please feel free to share input here.
Greg Baker
Frequently Asked Questions
General FAQs
- How does school funding work?
- Have we done any outreach to bring families back (and increase enrollment)?
- Why are districts having these issues?
- How do levies play into this?
- How does enrollment impact the district?
- What sort of reductions will we see if the state doesn’t increase funding?
- Why have you been building new schools, fields and facilities if you thought budget challenges were on the horizon?
- What are binding conditions? Are we one of the 20 districts that we are hearing might be going into binding conditions?
- Why are we not getting experience factor?
- Should I be worried about my job?
How does school funding work?
Bellingham Public Schools’ budget is prepared in accordance with the laws and legal requirements of the school district board, Washington state and the federal government. The budget is a document that demonstrates our values and how the school district will direct limited resources to achieve the goals described in The Bellingham Promise, our strategic plan.
We receive most of our funding from the state and through local levies and bonds. We get additional dollars from grants and the federal government.
Visit the budget for current and historical budget information and ASB reports.
Have we done any outreach to bring families back (and increase enrollment)?
Compared to 2019-20, our enrollment is down about 482 students.
When we dig into the reasons why some students have left Bellingham Public Schools, it’s mostly due to interest in homeschooling or moving out of the district. Some have assumed we have “lost” a significant number of students to private schools in the area, but as private schools are not required to report enrollment to the state, this assumption is difficult to verify. Unfortunately, we are also seeing declining birth rates in Whatcom County and across WA State, which will not help our future enrollment.
Why are districts having these issues?
Our budget challenges are not unique to Bellingham. School districts across our state and the country are facing similar funding challenges.
School districts, including BPS, are facing reductions for a number of reasons. The most significant reason is that state funding is not keeping pace with inflation and district demands.
Our state’s funding models and formulas are flawed.
How do levies play into this?
Like nearly every district in Washington, we rely on levies to provide essential funding for programs not fully funded by our state. Like other school districts in Whatcom County and across the state, we put forth two levies every four years for voters to consider: an operations and technology levy. These replacement levies pay for nearly 25 percent of the cost of educational services that the state does not adequately fund.
Because the state’s funding has been limited, we rely more and more on our levies to sustain our budget to pay for staff and programs. We are not using levy funds as they were intended for enrichment, rather they help fund “basic education” and daily operations.
How does enrollment impact the district?
Student enrollment is the key driver for the state funding formula. We are eligible to receive funding from the state for every student enrolled in our district. Enrollment is a critical factor in determining our revenues and costs. In recent years, our state, including Bellingham, have experienced low birth rate trends and a slow recovery of enrollment since COVID. As our enrollment decreases, funding declines.
What sort of reductions will we see if the state doesn’t increase funding?
We do not know specifically what programs or positions could be affected or reduced. We will rely on our guiding principles and input from our community to help us make tough decisions, as needed.
Why have you been building new schools, fields and facilities if you thought budget challenges were on the horizon?
We use the adage “bonds are for building.” Funding for any of our new schools (Sehome, Sunnyland, Parkview and Alderwood), fields (Squalicum, Bellingham and Sehome) and our new District Office were all built thanks to supported bonds from 2013, 2018 and 2022. We cannot use bond dollars to pay teacher salaries or other teaching and learning programs. Bond dollars are restricted to construction and remodeling projects.
What are binding conditions? Are we one of the 20 districts that we are hearing might be going into binding conditions?
School districts are placed into binding conditions when the district’s budgeted expenditures are higher than revenues and savings (fund balance) combined. When the fund balance is too low cash flow becomes a problem, and they are not able to pay staff and/or regular bills. Bellingham Public Schools is not in binding conditions.
Why are we not getting experience factor?
We do not receive an experience factor funds because the state model uses old, outdated data. The state recalculates every three years, instead of every year. Last year, legislation was proposed to change this. It did not make it through. If up-to-date data was used, we would be receiving $3.6M additional dollars for the 2024-25 school year.
Should I be worried about my job?
At this point, we believe we need to cut millions of dollars in our budget, which will likely impact our work force as staff make up over 80% of our budget. If we need to reduce full time equivalent (FTE) staff, we will try to do this with attrition when possible, which means not replacing positions when someone retires or leaves. You can see our guiding principles we use when making budget decisions.
Understanding School Funding Terms
- What is apportionment?
- What is attrition?
- What is a fund balance?
- What are MSOCs?
- What is regionalization?
- What is the difference between certificated and classified staff?
What is apportionment?
"Apportionment" for school districts refers to the state funding distributed proportionally to individual school districts based on formulas that consider factors such as student enrollment, demographics, and special needs. The Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) allocates and distributes the state funds to local education agencies as directed by Washington State Legislature.
What is attrition?
What is a fund balance?
A fund balance is the excess of a fund’s assets over its liabilities and reserves. The reserves include portions of the fund balance that are restricted, committed, or assigned to a specific purpose. It is used to provide funds for unforeseen emergency situations, cash flow fluctuations, offset economic downturns, and to help balance the budget when districts experience revenue shortfall or are affected by other uncertainties.
Washington state law does not require school district to maintain a minimum fund balance. However, Bellingham Public School’s policy 6022, requests the district to maintain a minimum fund balance of 3 to 5 percent of General Fund expenditures.
What are MSOCs?
Material, Supplies, and Operating Costs (MSOCs) are non-salary related expenditures including technology, utilities and insurance, curriculum and textbooks, facilities maintenance, instructional professional development, and other supplies.
These costs for schools have risen dramatically, far outpacing the funding provided by the state. In 2024-25, we are budgeting to spend $6.8M on utilities and insurance, $3M more than the amount the state funds us. Utility costs have increased 41 percent since 2018-19, while insurance costs have more than tripled in that time.
What is regionalization?
Regionalization is an adjustment to the funding model designed to account for cost-of-living differences across districts. The Legislature reviews and rebases compensation allocations using an inflationary measure to be representative of market experience for school districts. It is determined by the median home value in each school district, as well as those of proximate school districts, which are defined as those districts within 15 miles of a district's border. State salary allocations are based on State-wide average allocations plus regionalization, and where applicable an experience factor rather than staff experience mix.
Bellingham Public Schools was previously given 12 percent regionalization by the state. The state has decreased this amount in the last few school years. For 2024-25, BPS was only given 6 percent.
The purpose of regionalization was to help fund salaries, so the yearly allocation was included in salary budgets. However, as the district faced a decline in regionalization funds, salaries were maintained at their original levels to prevent staff from experiencing pay cuts. As a result, a larger portion of salaries are now unfunded by the state.
What is the difference between certificated and classified staff?
Certificated staff are employees such as teachers, principals, counselors and others who serve in positions covered under the continuing contract law that hold a professional education certificate issued by OSPI and are employed by a school district in positions for which such certificate is required by statute, rule of the State Board of Education, or written policy or practice of the employing district.
Classified staff are employees such as accountants, secretaries, instructional assistants, custodians, food service workers, office assistants, and others who do not hold a professional education certificate issued by OSPI or are employed by the district in positions which do not require such a certificate. It is possible for an individual to hold a valid certificate, be serving in a classified position, and be paid as a classified person.
Additional Resources
- Bellingham Public Schools 2026 Legislative Priorities, updated January 5, 2026
- School board resolution to Washington State Legislature
- School board op-ed: Local levies can’t keep covering for the state’s broken school funding system (January 2026)
- Published in Cascadia Daily News, The Bellingham Herald, Salish Current
- OSPI’s legislative budget requests
- ‘We can’t go backwards’: Whatcom educators, students advocate for better K-12 funding
- Information about PreK-12 funding in Washington state from Washington Association of School Administrators (WASA)
- What are the “big three?”
- State Association Letter on School Funding
- Op-Ed by Joel Aune of WASA in The Seattle Times
Historical Budget Information and Reports
ASB Fund Balance and Extracurricular Reports
ASB Fund Balance Reports
Associated Student Body (ASB) funds are public monies raised on behalf of students, and are used for optional, extra-curricular events of a cultural, athletic, recreational, or social nature. In general, carryover amounts from one year to another are due to anticipated expenditures for student activities which take more than a year of fundraising. These funds are not available for curricular, or graded student activities.
This financial report reflects the detailed ASB account balances by school. Beginning balances are as of September 1 and ending balances are as of August 31 for each year. The current year report is unaudited, and may not reflect final ending balances for the year.
Click the links below to view ASB Fund Balance Reports by year:
ASB Extracurricular Reports
2025-26
- Final Budget (Last updated Oct. 13, 2025)
- Update on budget planning for 2025-26, thanks for your feedback (May 9, 2025)
- 2025-26 budget planning, watch video of state superintendent (Jan. 16, 2025)
- School Board urges legislators to address PreK-12 funding challenges (Dec. 18. 2024)
- Bellingham Public Schools 2025 Legislative Priorities, updated December 12, 2024
- School Board letter to legislators (Dec. 12, 2024)
- Letters to the Editor/OpEd - How the Washington state budget affects K-12 education at Whatcom County schools (January 2025)
- Looking ahead: potential budget challenges for the 2025-26 school year; watch video (Oct. 23,. 2024)
- Dr. Baker budget presentation - current budget context (September 25, 2024)
- Cost saving measures for 2025-26
- Budget Development Process
- Budget Process and Timeline
- Budget Reprioritization Guiding Principles
- Priorities for Progress 2025-26
2024-25
2024-25
- Final Budget
- (Last updated Oct. 30, 2024)
- Budget Update for May 2024 (May 2, 2024)
- 2024-25 Budget Update (March 14, 2024)
- Thank you, Bellingham Voters levy results update (February 13, 2024)
- Upcoming levies and budget planning for the 2024-25 school year (January 9, 2024)
- Budget Development Process
- Budget Process and Timeline
- Budget Reprioritization Guiding Principles
- Priorities for Progress 2024-25
2023-24
2023-24
- Final Budget
- (Last Updated Jan. 31, 2024)
- Budget and construction news and facilities update for June 2023
- Budget Update (April 26, 2023) Why we are facing budget reductions
- Q&A video with Dr. Baker April 26, 2023
- Budget Update (April 21, 2023)
- Frequently asked questions about budget planning for 2023-24
- Budget Update (March 30, 2023)
- Budget Update and Q&A video with Dr. Baker (Jan. 26, 2023)
- Budget Update (December 8, 2022)
- Budget Development Process
- Budget Process and Timeline
- Budget Reprioritization Guiding Principles
- Priorities for Progress 2023-24
2022-23
2021-22

The 2025-26 academic year budget received the Meritorious Budget Award from the Association of School Business Officials International (ASBO). The MBA recognizes excellence in school budget presentation and reflects the district’s commitment to sound fiscal management and budgetary policies.
